Kennedy said he turned down the universal health coverage plan offered by the Republican President in the early 1970s because it wasn’t everything he wanted it to be. He later realized it was a missed opportunity to make major progress toward his goal.
” —Health care reform was Sen. Ted Kennedy’s unfinished life’s work (via ericmortensen) (via mikehudack)August 2009
dalasverdugo: variation: mikehudack: spytap:
This article blew my mind, especially the part where it describes how a single particle spinning in space might not actually be said to be spinning at all. I felt like CJ right after they flipped the map.
Kennedy said he turned down the universal health coverage plan offered by the Republican President in the early 1970s because it wasn’t everything he wanted it to be. He later realized it was a missed opportunity to make major progress toward his goal.
” —Health care reform was Sen. Ted Kennedy’s unfinished life’s work (via ericmortensen) (via mikehudack)TheHill.com - Obama’s FCC to enforce ‘net neutrality’
Right on Julius !
(via bijan)And this is the cause of my life — new hope that we will break the old gridlock and guarantee that every American — north, south, east, west, young, old — will have decent, quality health care as a fundamental right and not a privilege.” —
TED KENNEDY, speaking at the Democratic National Convention, Aug. 25, 2008
(via the NY Times)
“I am a part of all that I have met
Tho much is taken, much abides
That which we are, we are —
One equal temper of heroic hearts
Strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.”
For me, a few hours ago, this campaign came to an end. For all those whose cares have been our concern, the work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die.” —Ted Kennedy - 1980 Democratic National Convention Address (via apsies) (via think4yourself)
And now he’s remembered as a great man. The thing is, he didn’t change — he always was.
” —Ted Kennedy - Paul Krugman Blog - NYTimes.com (via think4yourself)I listened to Steele this morning on NPR. Ugh, what a douche.Indeed, Republicans seem determined to preserve the uniquely American system under which health care is rationed today — on the basis of employment status and ability to pay. According to the respected Institute of Medicine, this market-based approach to rationing has held the number of untimely deaths each year to a mere 18,000 uninsured souls. Thanks to Medicare, all of those victims are younger than 65, but apparently that is the kind of age-based rationing that real Republicans can embrace.
After reading his broadside, one is left wondering exactly what health reform plan Steele thought he was attacking. At one point, Steele claims that Democrats would prevent Americans from keeping their doctors or an insurance plan they like. Later, he warns that government will soon be setting caps on how many heart surgeries could be performed in the United States each year. Where is he getting this stuff? Has the chairman of the Republican Party somehow gotten hold of a top-secret plan for a government takeover of the health-care system that GOP operatives snatched during a break-in at Democratic National Committee headquarters?
If all that sounds spurious and unsubstantiated, it is. And like many of the overstated claims in this column, its purpose is to highlight the lies, distortions and political scare tactics that Steele and other Republicans have used to poison the national debate over health reform.
Have you no shame, sir? Have you no shame?
This is a very good article and this snippet only scratches the surface. Read.
Not only do Hughes’ movies imply that teens can care as much about romance as about sex, they remind us of a time when you could be odd and be mostly left alone to deal with it. No extreme interventions or psychiatric diagnoses.
If the brooding, solitary Andie played by Ringwald in “Pretty in Pink” were in high school in 2009, it’s hard to imagine she wouldn’t be a candidate for anti-depression therapy. Likewise, if “The Breakfast Club,” which is about five teens serving time in Saturday detention, took place in a post-Prozac, post-Columbine America, Ally Sheedy’s mostly mute, kleptomaniac misfit would have undoubtedly been medicated, and Anthony Michael Hall’s character would have received a lot more than detention for bringing a flare gun to school. As for Ferris Bueller, the kid obviously needed Ritalin.
I’m not suggesting that any of us were better off when legitimate disorders went unrecognized and untreated. But in a culture in which diagnoses sometimes seem to get handed out like conservation-awareness fliers in front of the supermarket, it’s worth asking ourselves if old-fashioned eccentricity — of the teen or adult variety — can too easily be supplanted by the ease of assigning a code from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual. Hughes, who left the movie business in the early 1990s because he feared the impact Hollywood would have on his children, should be remembered not just for the way he appreciated weirdness but for the way he normalized it — not with pills but with paisley.”
” —John Hughes: He made weird normal (Los Angeles Times) (via psychotherapy)Blogger/activist Lane Hudson stood up and interrupted Bill Clinton’s keynote last night at the Netroots Nation conference in Pittsburgh, asking, “Mr. President, will you call for a repeal of DOMA and Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell? Right now?”
Clinton responded to Hudson that he ought to go to one of the health care town halls. “You’d do really well there.” But Hudson did get the answer he wanted, and more on DOMA.
Answered Clinton, when interrupted again: “You wanna talk about ‘Don’t Ask Don’t Tell’, I’ll tell you exactly what happened. You couldn’t deliver me any support in the Congress and they voted by a veto-proof majority in both houses against my attempt to let gays serve in the military and the media supported them. They raised all kinds of devilment. And all most of you did was to attack me instead of getting some support in the congress. Now, that’s the truth.”
Clinton went on to explain why he signed DOMA: “We were attempting at the time, in a very reactionary congress, to head off an attempt to send a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage to the states. And if you look at the Levin referendum much later in 2004, in the election, which the Republicans put on the ballot, to try to get the base vote for President Bush up, I think it’s obvious that something had to be done to try to keep the Republican congress presenting that.”
(via thepoliticalpartygirl)
notthatkindagay:jasencomstock:
You would think that if Republicans wanted to totally mischaracterize a health care provision and demagogue it like nobody’s business, they would at least pick something that the vast majority of them hadn’t already voted for just a few years earlier. Because that’s not just shameless, it’s stupid.
Yes, that’s right. Remember the 2003 Medicare prescription drug bill, the one that passed with the votes of 204 GOP House members and 42 GOP Senators? Anyone want to guess what it provided funding for? Did you say counseling for end-of-life issues and care? Ding ding ding!!
Let’s go to the bill text, shall we? “The covered services are: evaluating the beneficiary’s need for pain and symptom management, including the individual’s need for hospice care; counseling the beneficiary with respect to end-of-life issues and care options, and advising the beneficiary regarding advanced care planning.” The only difference between the 2003 provision and the infamous Section 1233 that threatens the very future and moral sanctity of the Republic is that the first applied only to terminally ill patients. Section 1233 would expand funding so that people could voluntarily receive counseling before they become terminally ill.
So either Republicans were for death panels in 2003 before turning against them now—or they’re lying about end-of-life counseling in order to frighten the bejeezus out of their fellow citizens and defeat health reform by any means necessary. Which is it, Mr. Grassley (“Yea,” 2003)?
Behind the scenes, however, Mr. Obama and his advisers have been quite active, sometimes negotiating deals with a degree of cold-eyed political realism potentially at odds with the president’s rhetoric.
Aaron Swartz (via azspot)
Try to remember the actual humans affected by the casual lunchtime political conversations you have with your friends. I think that’s also David Simon’s main thesis.
(via dalasverdugo)mikehudack: asprettyasasong:jhnbrssndn: redguard: thedeathoftruespirit: adamquinn:
The US spent $711 billion on military last year. Even more this year.
We’re spending several times more money on killing millions than it would take to save and improve the lives of billions.
This estimate is bullshit. The corruption and total lack of infrastructure in the areas that most need our help will double, triple, quadruple the actual cost. And the comparison to military spending is completely unfair as well. The United States military contributes to a pax Americana that allows for globalization. These folks would be even worse off without globalization. Some portion of that US military budget (and the EU military budget, etc.) is actually helping feed starving people around the world.
I originally posted this without comment, but Mike makes excellent points.Jack’s Mannequin- Dark Blue
Alternet is running an excerpt from Ellen Rupel Shell’s fascinating new book, Cheap: the High Cost of Discount Culture. The piece handily illustrates Shell’s argument that outlet malls are for suckers.
A few choice points, summarized for your convenience:
- Manufacturers’ suggested retail prices are a joke, often wholly fabricated to give consumers impression that they are getting bargains.
- Outlet malls are based in the middle of nowhere not only because the real estate is cheaper but as part of their marketing strategy. When consumers have to drive an hour or two to shop, shopping becomes a day-long venture, a veritable investment. Those who make the trek will thus feel compelled to spend more to make up for their “sunk costs” in time, energy, and gas.
- Instead of following the old-school mall approach of trying to make consumers comfortable in order to keep them inside, outlet malls do the opposite: they go for discomfort and turnover. Shell writes that, “On average, shoppers spend nearly 80 percent more money at a bare bones outlet mall than they would at a fully loaded regional mall.”
- Many stores-Coach, the Gap, Brooks Brothers, Ann Taylor, Donna Karan—produce lower-quality merchandise specifically for their outlets.
How Outlet Malls Have Convinced Shoppers into Thinking They’re Getting a Sweet Deal [Cheap: the High Cost of Discount Culture]
You have no idea what it’s like to be called into a sterile conference room with a hospital administrator you’ve never met before and be told that your mother’s insurance policy will only pay for 30 days in ICU. You can’t imagine what it’s like to be advised that you need to “make some decisions,” like whether your mother should be released “HTD” which is hospital parlance for “home to die,” or if you want to pay out of pocket to keep her in the ICU another week. And when you ask how much that would cost you are given a number so impossibly large that you realize there really are no decisions to make. The decision has been made for you. “Living will” or no, it doesn’t matter. The bank account and the insurance policy have trumped any legal document.
If this isn’t a “death panel” I don’t know what is.
So don’t talk to me about “death panels” you heartless, cruel, greedy sons of bitches, who are only too happy to keep the profits rolling in to the big insurance companies while you spout your mealy-mouthed bumper sticker slogans about the evils of socialism. You don’t even know what socialism is. You don’t know what government healthcare is. You have no fucking clue about anything except that you lost the last election and you’re pissed off.” —Southern Beale: Don’t Talk To Me About Death Panels (via AZspot, marco, lallygagging, robot-heart-politics, apsies) (via bringmethathorizon) (via think4yourself)
jhnbrssndn: redguard: thedeathoftruespirit: adamquinn:
The US spent $711 billion on military last year. Even more this year.
We’re spending several times more money on killing millions than it would take to save and improve the lives of billions.
(via julieklausner)
(via tylercoates)